Be careful with the focus. Has a good weight to it. This is great news if you like to photograph small things up close. Generally, prime lenses have a reputation for being slightly sharper, and I have found that to be true whether I am shooting a nebula or a Scarlet Tanager. The Rokinon 135mm F2.0 is considered to be a full-frame lens because it can accommodate a full-frame image sensor with its 18.8-degree angle of view. Tack sharp even at wide open aperture. Literally it means "blur" so you could just as well use the dictionary definition below the top match from Google search: Bokeh - the visual quality of the out-of-focus areas of a photographic image, especially as rendered by a particular lens. Voting ends March 8, 2023. One of Canon's best lenses for a reasonable price. 2 Dielectric Diagonals. RATING. however i started to realise how every subject might actually be a cardboard cutout being photographed. Im currently shooting with a Canon 60D. Wonderful image quality, lots of detail, contrasty, subject separation, fast and accurate AF, bright viewfinder, solid construction, unobtrusive in use, No weather sealing, makes all my other lenses look poor (even the 'L' zooms that, when I first got them, imagined could hardly be improved on). I thought I would miss shooting at 200mm, but 135mm is long enough for most portraits and gives a decent amount of compression. A promising start, no doubt, but not a master yet! Now, I have to admit that up to this point, it sounds a little too good to be true. Sometimes though, we stumble upon a great lens design which is strong in all three. I should mention that I have only tested this full-frame lens using my astrophotography DSLRs, all of which are crop-sensor camera bodies. It improves slightly stopped down. Looking forward to allow purchasing the Canon 200mm f/2.8L II USM. It's an ideal portrait lens. Pocketable. In the highest contrast situations there's a hint of both purple and green fringing but both are minor and easy to remove with software. It's sharp, has very low aberrations, no real distortion and the bokeh is very nice. But you are talking more than 2x crop (cut half by width and height) and that leaves you to twice smaller resolution == quarter of the Mpix count. I have just acquired my astrophotography set up thanks to all your videos and doing some research. At the other end of the aperture range though, the 5D's larger pixels actually help matters, as the softening starts later (it's very sharp even at f/16), and is noticeably lower at f/32. You might never need another lens in the overlapping range at 135mm there isn't much difference between the separation afforded by f/2 vs f/2.8, and the latest 70-200s are plenty sharp. This lens has only two drawbacks. In fact, a light-weight 200/2.8 seems more interesting to own (e.g., the Minolta 200/2.8). You can barely tell it's a pond.#3: Duck.Birds with bokeh are fine. Great reach for street shots. I find neither the cat nor the duck particularly good. I wish every lens was this good!! Amazing colours, contrast, bokeh, everything! Even if the background is very close to your subject, somehow the optical construction in the 135mm lens will still manage to separate the background beautifully. And you can even crop a 135 efl with today's sensors should you actually need it. Most of these APOs have F ratios around 6.5, and are unable to comprehend in their field of view large celestial objects such as the Andromeda galaxy, the North America nebula, and comets. (purchased for $1,100), reviewed August 12th, 2009 Excellent color and saturation, a virtually perfect lens. this lens typifies modern design being confined to sharpness, colour & bokeh. Light weight and robust. Litepanels Studio X2 Bi-Color LED Fresnel Light. I bought it for its bokeh. That's a cheap, fun date for AP. I ordered this lens on Amazon, utilizing my Amazon Prime membership. Great question Scott I think it depends on the image. However, stepping outside to polar align a small star tracker and attach a DSLR and lens is quick and painless. Everyone should have one? 8MP is plenty for the usual 8x10 or 16x20 portrait print. " Manual focus on wide angle lens, for landscapes, ok, if you have a reliable manual focus system, which Samyang, at least in my mount, does not have. Tiring. Focal length is great. The Rokinon 135mm F/2 ED UMC. Thanks, As soon as e.g. Some real life images from my photoblog: http://hellabella.de, One of the best and sharpest lens around. He has quite a breadth photos many of which are quite good. Most small refracting telescopes start in the 300 to 400 mm focal length range, and even these are classed as widefield telescopes. And yet this review is on front page of DPReview prompting me to go and buy this lens -- so surely it must be a professional , well grounded review, right? You can't really ask them to stand still while you move around. The finish and texture of the Rokinon 135mm F/2 is a step up from the 14mm F/2.8 I ordered a few years ago. A higher-res Blackmagic Studio Camera just dropped. One of my very best lenses! lol, nice images, and i nearly bought this lens myself a few years ago. I had both for a while. Part of it might be that they were designed for film photography and modern digital sensor are far more demanding in terms of optical quality. tanie i dobre opinie 9 opatek lub Biznes HUMAN Sport Insect Architektura Specjalne Krajobrazy Martwa natura Podry People 2023 Obiektyw o staej ogniskowej Any good ones apart from the Big Boys. Excellent build quality, fast auto focus, and its fast. Hey Trevor, great article! Rokinon FE14M-C Lens. I'm thinking a modern (but expensive) Nikon 200mm f/2.0, 300mm f/4 or f/2.8 or a Borg telephoto/telescope would all be very good. If you are a Nikon user, of course have a look at the Nikon AF Nikkor 135mm f/2D DC and compare it to the other lenses mentioned in this article. I would never shell out hundreds of euros for a 135 prime let alone one with manual focus. One of them is simplicity: A clear, simple subject that constitutes a shape, standing out and contrasting against a calm and simple background. Although your target audience is beginning DSLR imagers, much of your advice also applies to using lenses with CCD cameras. Thats quite a jump from 135mm, so the camera body you use with this lens may change the types of targets you shoot. Film Friday: DPRTV reviews Fujifilm's Acros II film, Fujifilm launches Instax Mini 12 instant camera, DPReview March Madness, vote for your champions, Canon RF 16mm F2.8 STM sample gallery (DPReview TV), OM System M. Zuiko 90mm F3.5 Macro sample gallery, Live from Japan: Highlights from CP+ 2023, Retro Review: 24 years later, the Sony F505 is still pretty cool, Hands on with the OM System M. Zuiko 90mm F3.5 Macro, New FAA rules make it easier for recreational drone pilots to fly in restricted US airspaces, Leica marks James Bond's 60th* with a special edition D-Lux 7, Film Friday: A closer look at the Pentax KX, an original K-mount SLR, Blackmagic Design announces a new Studio Camera 6K Pro, National Geographic selects Pictures of the Year photo contest winner, Sigma brings DC DN APS-C primes to Nikon Z-mount, Panasonic Lumix S 14-28mm F4-5.6 Macro sample gallery, Tamron announces 11-20mm F2.8 ultra-wide zoom for Fujifilm X-mount, Film Friday: DPReview TV steps back in time to shoot APS film, Finer Points: Here's an easy way to improve video autofocus, DPReview TV: One simple fix to improve video autofocus, Head-to-head: Adobe Super Resolution vs. ON1 Resize AI vs. Topaz Labs Gigapixel AI, Waiting for the fishy in the little dishy by Gil Aegerter, Lava Lizard on Marine Iguana by ZimmWisdom. This gives me the power of 162x, which is barely sufficient for my 420mm fl APO astrograph at full camera resolution. Why so salty? MCovington, my Zeiss 300/4 is the full thickness barrel version, made in West Germany, serial number 5990836. For posed portraiture, it's a very nice budget option.FWIW, I'm a corporate portrait and event pro. Large focus ring. First of all, the background separation and the bokeh: I had photographed lots of animals in bushes before, but never before had I seen the bush melt away in the way it did with the 135mm lens. I think they are an outstanding value for any wide-field astrophotographer, and are particularly suitable for newcomers. But like a glitch in the matrix, an anomaly that shouldn't exist, you can get the Samyang/Rokinon 135mm for as little as $430 brand new. Why take a step back from 250 to sit between the RedCat and the 24-105? I dont mean to be rude, but I fail to see any photographic comparison or test to display the quality of this lens against others, concerning coma or anything else, except considerations on the manual focusing, its shape and ergonomic. Begun in 1975, the Pentax K-mount legacy continues to this day. The Canon 135mm f/2 is no less impressive on a full-frame camera. I had one question that i cant seem to find an answer to.. It is fantastic on my old 5d. Or is there a use case for fitting the Samyang 135mm to a Panasonic gx85 (or Panasonic gh5) ?? Holiday Savings $50 . But she might as well be in front of a green screen. But ppl should know there is much better advice in the forums. Plus it is harder to attach than other lens hoods. The 5D's larger pixels also make chromatic aberration somewhat lower at most apertures. To remedy this, I reduced the star size in post, and I started shooting at F/4 to really tighten things up. And if you want autofocus, I would recommend the Canon 135mm f2.0L, which is incredibly light for its performance at just 750g. While there are certainly pricey 135mm F2 lenses out there (such as the aforementioned Sigma 135mm F1.8 Art, or the Carl Zeiss 135mm) there are a couple that give you extreme value for the money. Wonderful, smooth bokeh. In excellent condition, this lens retails for around $200. The difference between modern and old telephoto lenses is probably similar to the difference between my APO and an old Jaegers 5in F5. After several years off, the venerable magazine has held a public open call photo contest and selected nine finalists and one winning image for its 'Photos of the Year.'. The colder temperatures will make DSLR astrophotography much more practical, and there are plenty of great targets to choose from. Ive spent a handful of nights testing this lens in my Bortle Scale Class 6/7 backyard, and my results live up to the hype it gets in terms of astrophotography performance. One difference worth pointing out is for those who image using narrowband filters. The 135 is lighter, but that's its only advantage. But do some experimenting before you decide. Standards have risen in recent years. They were not however designed to be bokeh monsters though that was just a side effect of making them fast and people bought them for speed with bokeh being the afterthought so not Bokeh for the sake of Bokeh as he said. No more inside shooting with flash! Its a no brainer if you use this focal length. And as this article clearly shows, no amount of blurr will make a poorly composed photo good. http://www.adstateagent.com | http://www.printradiant.com | http://www.hitsticker.com, I love this lens. f1.4 was a necessisty rather than a creative luxury. As in all arts the client's likes influence the result up to a point. And they like circles (no ellipses or polygons) and smooth colour (no hard edges, no onion rings). Sigma 105/2.8 DG EX Macro (very sharp at infinity) Are you really using 135 a lot? Sme of the wide field are. Great looking lens, if you ever saw it from the front. Still - a great portrait lens when used at f/2.8 or f/4, with a creamy bokeh indeed. Finally, although we don't explicitly test for it, we have to note that this lens' bokeh (rendering of out-of-focus objects) is really excellent as well. Samyang 135 f/2 astrophotography gallery Below some pictures I made using Samyang 135 lens with QHY163 mono camera and iOptron Smart EQ Pro mount.